Yet another quibble with the Rev. Jesse

I don’t much care for Jesse Jackson. I have no problems with self-promotion, but I’m not really down with people who do so under the pretense of working for a Noble Cause®. Not many causes in the US are more noble than civil rights. That’s pretty much how I’ve always seen Jesse – a guy who’s willing to step up for what’s right and fair so long as there’s a camera crew in the vicinity. Not everybody is going to agree with me on this, I realize.

Anyhow, Michael Richards, in what is either a) a heartfelt desire to make amends for his outrageous racial attack on a couple hecklers in a comedy club last week, or b) an all-too-predictable publicity stunt designed to salvage his career, depending on your perspective, reached out to the good Reverend last week. Jesse is apparently having none of it (or at least he’s not swallowing the whole hook).

Though Richards made an apologetic call to the civil rights leader last week, Jackson said he wants to use the comic’s outburst as an opportunity to start a national discussion about “racial insensitivity and indifference” in American society.

“We want to raise the larger question of racial insensitivity … and have a dialogue,” Jackson said. (Story.)

This is fine, so far as it goes. Anything that gets us a little closer to Dr. King’s dream is a good thing, and a broader dialogue on our persistent racial problems is probably a worthy goal.

Later on in the story, though, Jesse says something that seems to miss an important point.

Jackson said Hollywood has a history of racial inequality and singled out “Seinfeld” for not reflecting reality. He noted that other than the occasional appearance of a black lawyer, the show was “lily white.”

Well, yes and no. Was “Seinfeld” lily white? Absolutely. But is that an unrealistic portrait of America? Let’s test ourselves.

You’re out in public in Average America. You see five people having dinner together. Maybe it’s a guys’ night out or maybe it’s five girlfriends hanging after work. Whatever. Now, what is the racial composition of this group?

Part two: you see a TV ad featuring five guys out or five women hanging after work. What is the racial composition of this group?

On part two, I can just about guarantee that you’ll have something like two whites, a black, a Hispanic and an Asian. The make-up will be something recognizably media diverse, and we have reached the point where if you see a Chili’s commercial with five white guys it’s jarring, and automatically so. That’s just not how TV looks in 2k6.

Back to part one, though. In real world America, that five-person outing is, in most cases, going to be far more racially homogenous. Less so in more progressive and racially diverse urban environments, to be sure, but make no mistake – racial homogeneity in close friend in-groups is the reality, whether those folks are black, white, brown, yellow, or Martian. The idea that you have a white guy whose three best friends happen to be white, and who moves in a social circle that’s predominately white – where’s the unreality in that? And since his milieu is fairly moneyed, there’s hardly anything radical in the idea that you’re going to have a preponderance of caucasians, right? So it’s probably fair to ask if the Rev. Jackson is the one who’s at odds with “reality.”

If the complaint were that the lily white world of “Seinfeld” did represent reality and that we’d be better off in a world with more racial diversity and a broader distribution of wealth, that would seem a lot more on the mark to me.

That would be a slightly more complex argument to make, though, and when the cameras are rolling you have about eight seconds to get to the point. With Rev. Jesse, the point is usually “look at me,” a case that’s perfectly tailored to the eight-second reality.



6 thoughts on “Yet another quibble with the Rev. Jesse

  1. Jesse Jackson and Reality
    Great post about Rev Jackson. Interesting observation about the “real” group vs the “tv” group, too. There isn’t room here, but I have some ideas about racism and predjudice that have changed over the years, maybe I’ll tell you about it sometime. I had an opportunity to meet the Rev Jackson once. It was in the parking lot of the Pentagon, a few days after the plane hit on 9/11. The baptist men’s group that I volunteer with, as well as a couple of other groups as well the the Salvation Army and the Red Cross shared a big tent in the parking lot where we were serving food, coffee snacks, whatever, to the soldiers and other personnel who were combing the wreckage for bodies. We had a giant screen tv hooked up and newspapers and such so that the guys (and girls) could take a little bit of a break from their grusome task. There was a disturbance moving through the lot which turned out to be Jesse and his entourage with the accompanying camera crew. Now that the danger was minimized, Jesse wanted a photo-op. He was heading for our group to talk to someone on camera. I saw him coming and went the other way.

  2. Re: Jesse Jackson and Reality
    Good move. Although I think I’d have paid to see you get him on camera and put him to work, and then tell the camera’s to stick around a few hours just to make sure he wasn’t using this as a photo op.
    Yeah, that’s PPV material right there….

  3. As he does me, also.
    I’ve always found the concept of “Black leader” insulting to black people……as if blacks can’t make their own decisions, and need someone to lead them. Dr. King’s real sacrifices were necessary at that time, but the current crop of “leaders” are just self absorbed, publicity seeking, extortionists.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s